Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42166

Title: Feedstock and pyrolysis conditions of biochars: influence on soil phytotoxicity and water ecotoxicity
Authors: Coelho, Luisa
Canedo, João
Custódio, Mariana
Flores, Deolinda
Mourão, Paulo
Palma, Patrícia
Prats, Sérgio
Keywords: Soil restoration
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Inertinite
FTIR spectroscopy
Daphnia magna
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Coelho, L.; Canedo, J.N.G.V.; Custódio, M.; Flores, D.; Mourão, P.; Palma, P.; Prats, S.A. Feedstock and Pyrolysis Conditions of Biochars: Influence on Soil Phytotoxicity and Water Ecotoxicity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2025, 211, 109935.
Abstract: The use of biochar for soil restoration requires understanding ecological trade-offs, particularly how feedstock selection, dose, and production methods influence soil and aquatic ecotoxicity. The ecotoxicological effects of nine biochars derived from vineyard residues, Acacia wood, and olive pomace were evaluated after mixing them at rates of 1.5–5 % into two agricultural soils. Additionally, specific details of the biochar production method were assessed: blending ratios (vine pruning:stalks), pyrolysis temperature, (for Acacia wood) and hydrothermal activation method (for olive pomace). Physicochemical characterization—pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, carbon and nitrogen content, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), FTIR spectroscopy and inertinite content—was combined with ecotoxicological assessment (Lactuca sativa L. phytotoxicity test and aquatic lethal and sub-lethal bioassays with Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus). Vineyard pruning and shredded Acacia biochars, which had higher OM contents and lower EC and PAH concentrations, showed the lowest toxicity in soils and aqueous extracts. Soil mixed with biochar at 3–5 % blends optimally restored acidic soils through pH neutralization and moisture retention, which favoured seed growth. The aquatic assays showed stimulatory effects on D. magna feeding rates, increasing by 20–90 % at 5 % biochar concentration. Finally, production assessment revealed that both blending ratios and pyrolysis temperature caused minimal variability in organisms’ responses. Hydrothermal activation reduced PAH content (<0.08 mg kg􀀀 1) but failed to reduce salinity-driven ecotoxicity. These results suggest that 3–5 % wood-derived biochars are suitable to restore soils without risk to aquatic ecosystems. Olive pomace and vine stalk alternatives need a pre-application screening to detect PAHs and salinity conditions, essential factors affecting physicochemical properties of agricultural soils and environmental safety.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109935
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42166
Type: article
Appears in Collections:MED - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Paper Soil Biology and Biochemistry.pdf965.06 kBAdobe PDFView/OpenRestrict Access. You can Request a copy!
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois