Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/22837

Title: Feeding the soil AND feeding the cow – Conservation Agriculture in Kenya
Authors: Ndah, H.T.
Basch, G.
Rodrigues, P.
Sousa, J.
Editors: Tielkes, E.
Keywords: Conservation Agriculture
Adoption constraints
livelihoods
livestock
Issue Date: Sep-2017
Publisher: CUVILLIER VERLAG
Citation: Ndah H. T., Uckert G., Kaweesa S., Probst L., Kuria P., Mkomwa S., Rodrigues P., Sousa J., Basch G. & Schuler J. (2017): Feeding the soil AND feeding the cow – Conservation Agriculture in Kenya. Tropentag 2017. Book of Abstracts, Sept. 20-22, Bonn, Germany, p. 133.
Abstract: One of the main obstacles to the implementation of Conservation Agriculture (CA) in subSaharan Africa is the priority given to using crop residues as cattle feed rather than mulching material. As documented in past projects (e.g. CA-SARD, CA2Africa, ABACO), in this way the CA approach will not reach its full potential - particularly in countries with a limited biomass production due to climatic conditions. To identify pathways for enabling an implementation of CA that is not in conflict with other goals of farmers’ livelihoods (e.g. livestock farming), we used a transformative learning approach with farmers and other stakeholders in Laikipia County (Kenya). The learning elements comprised: a timeline that encompasses the past promotion activities; stakeholder mapping which highlights the various stakeholders involved and their influence; non-scripted participatory videos filmed by the stakeholders themselves that show the farming system from different perspectives; focus group discussions structured by the Qualitative expert Assessment Tool for CA adoption in Africa (QAToCA). Challenges to CA adoption that were jointly identified include the competition for fodder, a lack of financial resources to get started with CA. There are knowledge gaps on proper application of CA equipment, on the fodder production and conservation options and, lastly, on sustainable crop-livestock production systems. Furthermore, farmers feel disconnected from existing governmental support. However, our findings highlight solutions which enable feeding the soil “and” feeding the cow. Some farmers already have started to grow forages on their farms in order to reduce dependence on crop residues as a feeding source – an approach which had not been promoted during past projects. This shows the importance of an enabling environment provided by government programs which supports long-term extension efforts combined with farmers’ willingness to jointly learn towards a more sustainable agriculture. On farms where both systems (CA and conventional) are practised, women play an important role by experimenting with CA practices, thereby realising promising results in terms of yield and drought resilience. Furthermore, our findings underline the need for a long-term monitoring of innovation processes which is often not possible within short-term term research projects and promotion programs.
URI: http://www.tropentag.de/
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/22837
ISBN: 978-3-9801686-7-0
Type: article
Appears in Collections:FIT - Artigos em Livros de Actas/Proceedings
MED - Artigos em Livros de Actas/Proceedings

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Abstract_Ndah_Tropentag2017.pdf8.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois