Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6819

Title: Experimental and modeled UV erythemal irradiance under overcast conditions: the role of cloud optical depth
Authors: Antón, Manuel
Alados-Arboledas, Lucas
Guerrero-Rascado, Juan Luis
Costa, Maria João
Chiu, Christine
Olmo, Francisco Jose
Keywords: UV erythemal irradiance
cloud optical depth
Issue Date: Dec-2012
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Citation: Antón, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Costa, M. J., C Chiu, J., and Olmo, F. J.: Experimental and modeled UV erythemal irradiance under overcast conditions: the role of cloud optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11723-11732, doi:10.5194/acp-12-11723-2012, 2012.
Abstract: This paper evaluates the relationship between the cloud modification factor (CMF) in the ultraviolet erythemal range and the cloud optical depth (COD) retrieved from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) "cloud mode" algorithm under overcast cloudy conditions (confirmed with sky images) at Granada, Spain, mainly for non-precipitating, overcast and relatively homogenous water clouds. Empirical CMF showed a clear exponential dependence on experimental COD values, decreasing approximately from 0.7 for COD = 10 to 0.25 for COD = 50. In addition, these COD measurements were used as input in the LibRadtran radiative transfer code allowing the simulation of CMF values for the selected overcast cases. The modeled CMF exhibited a dependence on COD similar to the empirical CMF, but modeled values present a strong underestimation with respect to the empirical factors (mean bias of 22%). To explain this high bias, an exhaustive comparison between modeled and experimental UV erythemal irradiance (UVER) data was performed. The comparison revealed that the radiative transfer simulations were 8% higher than the observations for clear-sky conditions. The rest of the bias (~14%) may be attributed to the substantial underestimation of modeled UVER with respect to experimental UVER under overcast conditions, although the correlation between both dataset was high (R2 ~ 0.93). A sensitive test showed that the main reason responsible for that underestimation is the experimental AERONET COD used as input in the simulations, which has been retrieved from zenith radiances in the visible range. In this sense, effective COD in the erythemal interval were derived from an iteration procedure based on searching the best match between modeled and experimental UVER values for each selected overcast case. These effective COD values were smaller than AERONET COD data in about 80% of the overcast cases with a mean relative difference of 22%.
URI: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/11723/2012/acp-12-11723-2012.html
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/6819
Type: article
Appears in Collections:FIS - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
CGE - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
acp-12-11723-2012.pdf547.94 kBAdobe PDFView/OpenRestrict Access. You can Request a copy!
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois