|
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42291
|
| Title: | Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Paradigms in Vaccine Supply Chain Management: A Multi-Objective Simulation/Optimization Approach |
| Authors: | Gomes, Luís Pedro Ferreira, Paulo Almeida, Dora |
| Editors: | Galdames, I.S. Vázquez-Justo, E. Abreu, A. Carvalho, J.V. |
| Keywords: | Vaccine supply chain management Resilience Triple bottom line Simulation Multi-objective optimization |
| Issue Date: | May-2026 |
| Publisher: | Springer, Cham. |
| Citation: | Gomes, L.P., Ferreira, P., Almeida, D. (2026). Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Paradigms in Vaccine Supply Chain Management: A Multi-Objective Simulation/Optimization Approach. In: Galdames, I.S., Vázquez-Justo, E., Abreu, A., Carvalho, J.V. (eds) International Conference on Information Systems and Medicine. Volume 2. ICISMED 2025. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 1527. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99702-0_31 |
| Abstract: | Vaccination is crucial for human health, and the success of vaccination
programs depends not only on the vaccines themselves but also on the strength of
the supporting supply chain and logistical systems. The World Health Organization
emphasizes the importance of sustainability and resilience in vaccine supply chains,
as outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030. This paper aims to illustrate how
multi-objective simulation/optimization can assist decision-makers in integrating
sustainability and resilience concepts in vaccine supply chain management, based
on the Paradox Theory. The technique was applied to the operational management
of a vaccination point in the Central Alentejo region, resulting in nine non- dominated
solutions. This approach enables decision-makers to make data-based decisions and
gain insights into the potential outcomes before finalizing their choices. Our find
ings demonstrate that multi-objective simulation/optimization provides valuable
insights, allowing decision-makers to consider a more comprehensive “both-and”
approach instead of singular choices. |
| URI: | https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-99702-0_31#DOI http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42291 |
| Type: | bookPart |
| Appears in Collections: | CEFAGE - Publicações - Capítulos de Livros
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|