Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39870
|
| Title: | Evaluation of the influence of mechanical pruning in the performance of the row-side continuous canopy shaking harvester prototype |
| Authors: | Dias, A.B. Falcão, J. Pinheiro, A. Peça, J. |
| Editors: | Sankaran, S. Rousseau, D. |
| Keywords: | mechanical harvesting high density olive groves pruning |
| Issue Date: | 28-Feb-2023 |
| Publisher: | Acta Hortic. |
| Citation: | DIAS, A.B., FALCÃO, J., PINHEIRO, A. and PEÇA, J.O. (2023). Evaluation of the influence of mechanical pruning in the performance of the row-side continuous canopy shaking harvester prototype. Acta Hortic. 1360, 137-144. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1360.18.https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1360.18 |
| Abstract: | In high density olive orchards, mechanical harvesting is made by trunk shaking
requiring a high demand of manual labour. The use of adapted over-the-row grape
harvesters is not available in these groves due to large canopies dimension. A prototype
based on the side row concept was developed. The prototype comprises two
symmetrical harvesters trailed by a farm tractor. Each harvester has a vibratory rotor
with flexible rods, a catching platform with conveyor belts delivering fruits to a
temporary storage bag. From 2015 to 2018, authors carried out a trial to evaluate the
adequacy of olive canopy based on mechanical pruning in the performance of the
prototype. The trial was established in an irrigated olive orchard of the ‘Picual’ cultivar
planted with the array 7×3.5 m. In a randomized complete block design with three
replications, three treatments are being compared leading to 9 plots with 30 trees plot-1.
The treatments under study are: T1 – mechanical pruning: topping the canopy parallel
to the ground at 3.5 m high in 2015 and 3.3 m in 2017; hedging the two sides of the
canopy in 2015 at 1.4 m from the tree trunk; T2 – mechanical pruning: topping the
canopy parallel to the ground at 3.5 m high in 2015 and 3.3 m in 2017; hedging the two
sides of the canopy in 2015 at 1.0 m from the tree trunk; T3 – mechanical pruning +
manual pruning complement: topping the canopy parallel to the ground at 3.5 m high
in 2015 and 3.3 m in 2017; hedging the two sides of the canopy in 2015 at 1.0 m from
the tree trunk; manual pruning complement in 2015 to remove wood in the external
faces of the canopy and in 2017 to remove wood suckers inside the canopy. Regarding
the olive removal efficiency, significant differences were registered between years, but
no significant differences were found among treatments in each year. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39870 |
| Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | ERU - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|