Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/27728
|
Title: | Micro-remains from the mud floor of a communal building of Early Bronze Age I, at Arlantepe, Malatya |
Authors: | Zadeh, Enssieh Bagher |
Advisors: | Frangipane, Marcella Balossi, Francesca |
Keywords: | Micro-remains Micro-debris Micro-fauna Space Distribution Micro Analysis Micro-archaeology Household Household archaeology Early Bronze Age Arslantepe |
Issue Date: | 13-Dec-2018 |
Publisher: | Universidade de Évora |
Abstract: | ABSTRACT:
Distribution of cultural evidence contributes a great deal of information to archaeologist in
different scales from large communities to small dwellings. Accumulation of large amounts of
micro-remains put archaeologist in a big challenge of understanding a functionality of dwellings.
Micro-debris pertains to short-term activities that occurred near the end of dwelling use or even
after abandoning that. Micro-remain analyzing provides a great information in space distribution
and activity patterns. While architectural approach in household studies is focusing on boundaries
and plan, micro-remain analysis comprehend the interpretation of architecture and narratesthe real
story of house and dwelling. Arslantepe, during the end of 4th millennium witnessed dramatic
changes in occupation and structure. The mudbrick building (Building36) dating Early Bronze
Age I was rested on top of the large courtyard of the monumental hall belonged to the palace
complex dating to phase VIA. Burning in a huge fire provided large amounts of in situ material
from this building. This tragedy benefited archaeologists with lots of unique information. Floor
micro-remain analysis of Building 36, is required to find out the specific activity pattern and space
distribution. Building 36, consists of two separated rooms with noticeable amounts of in situ
materials which required more details in explaining functionality of each room. Two separated
room (A1000, A1369) and one storage space(A1374) demonstrated different functions. While
A1369 provided the evidence of cooking activity and storage use, A1000 the main hall
demonstrated ritual and ceremonial functionality. Comparison of the first phase of construction
with second phase shows that although structure of Building 36 had been changed but the
functionality of rooms did not vary significantly |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/27728 |
Type: | masterThesis |
Appears in Collections: | BIB - Formação Avançada - Teses de Mestrado
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|