Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Using Quantitative Aspects of Alignment Generation for Argumentation on Mappings
Authors: Isaac, Antoine
Trojahn, Cássia
Wang, Shenghui
Quaresma, Paulo
Keywords: argumentation
ontology mapping
Issue Date: Oct-2008
Abstract: State-of-the art mappers articulate several techniques using different sources of knowledge in an unified process. An important issue of ontology mapping is to find ways of choosing among many techniques and their variations, and then combining their results. For this, an innovative and promising option is to use frameworks dealing with arguments for or against correspondences. In this paper, we re-use an argumentation framework that considers the confidence levels of mapping arguments. We also propose new frameworks that use voting as a way to cope with various degrees of consensus among arguments. We compare these frameworks by evaluating their application to a range of individual mappers, in the context of a real-world library case.
Type: article
Appears in Collections:INF - Artigos em Livros de Actas/Proceedings

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
om08.pdfArtigo169.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois