http://hdl.handle.net/10174/47 Sun, 02 Aug 2026 22:35:44 GMT 2026-08-02T22:35:44Z http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42414 Title: Unpacking regional development in the EU: The interplay of cohesion, institutions, and sustainability Authors: Borrega, Alexandre; Rego, Conceição; Rocha de Sousa, Miguel Abstract: This paper examines regional development in the European Union from a multidimensional and dynamic perspective, addressing the limited understanding of how economic, social, institutional, and environmental dimensions interact over time. While existing research often treats these dimensions separately or relies on static indicators, less attention has been paid to their temporal interdependencies and adjustment dynamics. Using a panel vector autoregressive model with common correlated effects (PVAR-CCE) applied to 233 NUTS-2 regions over the period 2000–2022, the analysis identifies the dynamic interactions linking these dimensions while accounting for cross-sectional dependence and regional heterogeneity. The results provide evidence of a structured system of interdependencies governing regional development. They reveal a dual adjustment structure characterised by a fast-moving economic–social cycle linking employment, income, and youth exclusion, and a slower structural dynamic driven by institutional quality, human capital, and environmental conditions. These dynamics vary across regions and income levels, highlighting persistent structural constraints in lagging regions and more integrated development trajectories in advanced regions. Environmental sustainability emerges as a constitutive component of regional development rather than a peripheral outcome, extending place-based approaches beyond income-based frameworks. Overall, the findings contribute to a more integrated understanding of regional development and provide an empirical basis for assessing the feasibility of EU policy objectives related to cohesion, sustainability, and balanced territorial development. Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42414 2026-06-30T23:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42291 Title: Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Paradigms in Vaccine Supply Chain Management: A Multi-Objective Simulation/Optimization Approach Authors: Gomes, Luís Pedro; Ferreira, Paulo; Almeida, Dora Editors: Galdames, I.S.; Vázquez-Justo, E.; Abreu, A.; Carvalho, J.V. Abstract: Vaccination is crucial for human health, and the success of vaccination programs depends not only on the vaccines themselves but also on the strength of the supporting supply chain and logistical systems. The World Health Organization emphasizes the importance of sustainability and resilience in vaccine supply chains, as outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030. This paper aims to illustrate how multi-objective simulation/optimization can assist decision-makers in integrating sustainability and resilience concepts in vaccine supply chain management, based on the Paradox Theory. The technique was applied to the operational management of a vaccination point in the Central Alentejo region, resulting in nine non- dominated solutions. This approach enables decision-makers to make data-based decisions and gain insights into the potential outcomes before finalizing their choices. Our find ings demonstrate that multi-objective simulation/optimization provides valuable insights, allowing decision-makers to consider a more comprehensive “both-and” approach instead of singular choices. Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42291 2026-04-30T23:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42287 Title: The influence of institutional and in-group collectivism practices on next-generation engagement in the family business Authors: Torres, Pedro; Augusto, Mário; Quaresma, Rui Abstract: Purpose This research aims to investigate the influence of country culture on the next generation's intention to become managerial leaders of the family business, focussing on institutional and in-group collectivism practices. The authors investigate not only the direct effect of these collectivism practices on next-generation engagement, but also the extent to which institutional and/or in-group collectivism moderate the relationship between parental support and next-generation engagement and the extent to which institutional and/or in-group collectivism moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and next-generation engagement. Design/methodology/approach Using cross-national data from the Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students' Survey (GUESSS) and the Global Leadership and Organisational Behaviour Effectiveness (GLOBE), hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) is employed to test the hypotheses using a sample of 33,390 observations collected in 20 countries. Findings The main findings show that both institutional and in-group collectivism practices may increase next-generation engagement levels. Furthermore, these cultural practices can amplify the relationship between family business self-efficacy and next-generation engagement. However, institutional collectivism can slightly reduce the positive effect of parental support on family offspring's intention to become leaders of the family business. The results also reveal that parental support has a stronger direct effect on next-generation engagement than family business self-efficacy. Originality/value This study examines the influence of cultural practices on next-generation engagement, focussing on collectivism practices. The study distinguishes between institutional collectivism and in-group collectivism. Unlike past research, a direct effect of parental support on next-generation engagement is considered. The study also uses a particular type of self-efficacy: family business self-efficacy. In addition, a multi-level method is employed, which is rarely used in this context. Wed, 12 Jul 2023 23:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42287 2023-07-12T23:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42280 Title: Information Ethics Among College Students – Selected Countries Analysis Authors: Marreiros, Cristina G.; Milos, Ulman; Quaresma, Rui; Xiong, Jason; Harris, Albert L. Abstract: Information ethics (IE) influences how people use and produce information and affects information services, information technology (IT), and professional practices. Lack of IE severely affects individuals, teams, organizations, or the community. This research bridges a gap in understanding IE perceptions and IE-declared behavior among different sociodemographic profiles in the global communicative space. We devised an extended version of the IT ethics survey to measure attitudes toward IE issues. We surveyed a sample of 1,648 college students in seven countries. We identified four clusters, uncovering groups of people with very high (Legalists), high (Moralists), fair (Pragmatists), and low (Anarchists) perceptions of the IE issues. Clusters allow the exploration of patterns in IE perceptions that would remain hidden at an individual level of analysis and can help to predict IE-related behavior. The findings imply that teachers should adapt IE curricula, and managers should customize the policies and interventions to these groups. Furthermore, managers should consider group behavior and account for factors that affect it in the corporate world, such as lower computer knowledge. International managers should be aware that certain groups behave more unethically with IT and are overrepresented in certain countries. Sat, 27 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10174/42280 2024-01-27T00:00:00Z