Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/4199

Title: Ecological Mining - A Case Study on Dam Water Quality
Authors: Santos, Manuel F.
Cortez, Paulo
Quintela, Hélder
Neves, José
Vicente, Henrique
Arteiro, José
Editors: Zanasi, A.
Brebbia, C.A.
Ebecken, N.F.F.
Keywords: Data Mining
Knowledge Discovery from Databases
Decision Support
Water Quality
Decision Trees
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: WIT Press
Citation: Santos, M.F., Cortez, P., Quintela, H., Neves, J., Vicente, H. & Arteiro, J., Ecological Mining - A Case Study on Dam Water Quality. In A. Zanasi, C.A. Brebbia & N.F.F. Ebecken Eds., Data Mining VI – Data Mining, Text Mining and their Business Applications, WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, Vol. 35, pp. 523–531, WIT Press, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2005.
Abstract: The automatic assessment of barrage water quality is very restricted due to the distances, the number of biochemical parameters to be considered and the financial resources spent to obtain their values. To this scenario should be added the latency times between the sampling moment and the outcome of the laboratory analyses. Although the idea of considering sensors for remote acquisition of data is not new, there are some constraints to be addressed, like the existence of sensors to measure the pertinent parameters and their efficiency, the costs involved and the possibility of remote sensing. The application of this alternative is highly dependent on the relevance of the candidate parameters. At this point, the Data Mining (DM) approach assumes an important role, in the sense that it can reveal the relative importance of the parameters, as well the prediction models to determine the water quality and finally the associated accuracies. This paper introduces a decision framework to support the selection of biochemical parameters to be considered in remote sensing of water contained in barrages. The framework enables the comparison of the efficiency of two kinds of models, using decision trees. The first one uses all the water quality indicators, including the time and cost consuming variables, while the second model is based only on remotely real-time acquired parameters. When comparing both strategies under several criteria (e.g., cost, time and confidence), the latter method was showed to be the best alternative.
URI: http://library.witpress.com/pages/PaperInfo.asp?PaperID=15036
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/4199
ISBN: 1-84564-017-9
ISSN: 1743-3517
Type: bookPart
Appears in Collections:QUI - Publicações - Capítulos de Livros
CQE - Publicações - Capítulos de Livros

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2005_DM_2005_RD.pdf181.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois