|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35219
|
Title: | Practical work in science education: a systematic literature review |
Authors: | Oliveira, Hugo Bonito, Jorge |
Editors: | Buckley, Jeffrey |
Keywords: | science education practical work concept practical work advantages practical work assessment practical work disadvantages systematic review |
Issue Date: | May-2023 |
Publisher: | Frontiers in Education |
Citation: | Oliveira, H., & Bonito, J. (2023). Practical work in science education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1151641. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641 |
Abstract: | Practical work has taken a leading role in science teaching, particularly since the
1960s. Its goals are mainly oriented toward the development of sensitivity and
taste for the study of physical and natural phenomena, bringing students closer to
the daily reality experienced by researchers working in these areas of knowledge,
while promoting educational success. However, these purposes have not always
been achieved so, over time, limitations to the way that practical work has been
developed have also been identified. In order to recognize the current state of
the art on the development of the practical work in the teaching of sciences, a
systematic literature review was designed, especially focused on the definition of
the concept of practical work, its advantages, evaluation methodologies, and the
criticism/limitations attributed to its implementation. To this end, four databases
and one aggregator were used, to identify 53 international scientific publications.
Analysis of this corpus allowed the identification of 8 categories associated to the
concept of practical work, 5 categories associated to its advantages, 6 categories
with the types/methodologies of evaluation and 5 categories associated with the
limitations of this methodology. (From this analysis) it is concluded that most
authors considers that the main idea integrative idea of the concept of practical
work should be the manipulation of materials in practical activities (hands-on
style), and the main advantage of this methodology comes from the fusion
between the development of practical skills and the conceptual understanding
(minds-on). In the evaluation methods, the context, procedures and specific
instruments are favored and the main limitation pointed to this methodology is
that the way practical work is implemented, is often not in agreement with the
methods and techniques used by scientists and researchers. |
URI: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641/full?utm_source=F-NTF&utm_medium=EMLX&utm_campaign=PRD_FEOPS_20170000_ARTICLE http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35219 |
ISSN: | 2504-284X |
Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | PED - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|