|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26079
|
Title: | Comment on ‘‘Stratigraphy of the Northern Pulo do Lobo Domain, SW Iberia Variscides: A palynological contribution’’ by Zelia Pereira et al. (2018) – Geobios 51, 491–506 |
Authors: | Pereira, Manuel Francisco Martinez Poyatos, David Perez Caceres, Irene Gama, Cristina Azor, Antonio |
Keywords: | U-Pb zircon geochronology Palynomorphs Devonian-Carboniferous stratigraphy Pulo do Lobo Unit SW Iberia |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Pereira, M.F., Martinez Poyatos, D., Perez Caceres, I., Gama, C., Azor, A. (2019). Comment on ‘‘Stratigraphy of the Northern Pulo do Lobo Domain, SW
Iberia Variscides: A palynological contribution’’ by Zelia Pereira et al.
(2018) – Geobios 51, 491–506. Geobios 55: 103-106 |
Abstract: | The paper by Zelia Pereira et al. (2018) is a valuable input to
better constrain the Devonian palynological record of a number of
siliciclastic formations of the Pulo do Lobo Unit (also known as Pulo
do Lobo Domain or Pulo do Lobo Zone) in SW Iberia. They have
recognized for the first time in the Pulo do Lobo Fm. and in the
imbricated phyllites of the Peramora Me´lange palynomorph
assemblages assigned to the middle Frasnian, as well as new
Devonian palynomorphs in the Ribeira de Limas, Santa Iria and
Horta da Torre formations, and the Alajar Me´ lange. Furthermore,
Ze´ lia Pereira et al. (2018) intend to promote a ‘‘detailed discussion of
the palynological versus geochronological ages by comparing their
biostratigraphic ages with the maximum depositional ages
inferred for the same formations according to detrital zircon
geochronology (Pe´rez-Ca´ ceres et al., 2017; Pereira et al., 2017). The
purpose of their discussion is to question the validity of zircon
geochronological data, which allegedly would be contradictory
with the palynomorph content, and thus not compatible with the
established stratigraphic sequence. In our view, this discussion is
inconsistent due to:
i) the impossibility that primary igneous ages in zircon grains
would have been rejuvenated during Early Carboniferous low-
grade regional metamorphism;
ii) a wrong interpretation of the meaning and implications of
maximal depositional ages derived from the youngest detrital
zircon population. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2019.06.003 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26079 |
Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | CGE - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|