Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Macroinvertebrate community traits and nitrate removal in stream sediments|
|Authors: ||Yao, Jingmei|
Solimini, Angelo G
Battin, Tom J.
Puig, Maria A.
Pusch, Martin T.
Sanchez-Perez, Angelo G
|Editors: ||Wiley & Sons Ltd, John|
in-stream nitrate removal
|Issue Date: ||2017|
|Publisher: ||Freshwater Biology|
|Citation: ||Yao, Jingmei; Colas Fanny; Solimini Angelo G.; Battin Tom J.,Gafny Sarig; Morais Manuela; Puig Maria A.; Marti Eugenia; Pusch Martin T.; Voreadou Catherina; Sabater Fransesc; Julien Fredric; Sanchez-Perez José M.; Sauvage Sabine; Vervier Philippe; Gerino Magali, 2017 - Macroinvertebrate community traits and nitrate removal in stream sediments . Freshwater Biology: 62:929–944.|
|Abstract: ||1. In-stream nitrate removal capacity may be used as a proxy for the ecosystem service of water quality regulation. It is well known that this natural function is driven by abiotic and biotic factors in running water environments. With regard to biotic drivers, most of the literature focuses on the microbial community influences, but there has been very little emphasis on the relationship with the benthic macroinvertebrate community. Since this community feeds on microbial assemblages (autotrophic and/or heterotrophic biofilms) that live on the streambed and in the hyporheic zone of the river, macroinvertebrates also have the potential to influence nitrate removal via its influences on microbiological processes.
2. The objective of this study was to examine the potential relationship between the macroinvertebrate communities and nitrate removal. A dataset of in-stream nitrate
removal rates measured in nine-third-order streams was analysed. The simultaneous
influences of abiotic (hydromorphological, physical and chemical characteristics) and
biotic (biofilm and macroinvertebrate) drivers were examined and together explained
56% of the in-stream nitrate removal variance. An analysis of the independent contributions of each driver showed that abiotic drivers (e.g. ammonium, dissolved
organic carbon, temperature and transient zone) contributed 40% of this nitrate
removal variance, whereas the macroinvertebrate community contributed 39%.
3. The potential relationship between macroinvertebrates and nitrate removal was
subsequently explored using trait-based approaches of the macroinvertebrate community. This method allows for the selection of trait modalities assuming a top-down control of microbial communities by macroinvertebrates, with in-stream abiotic conditions correlated with nitrate removal (assuming that environmental conditions
affect macroinvertebrate community composition).
4. The main trait modalities positively correlated with nitrate removal were scraper
(feeding habit), flagstones/boulders/cobbles/pebbles (substrate preference), crawler
and interstitial (locomotion) and detritus (food). The main modalities negatively correlated with nitrate removal were silt and mud with microphytes (as substrate preference), and with fine sediment with microorganisms, and dead animals (as food
sources). These results agreed with the hypothesis of top-down control and enhanced understanding of the influence of hydromorphological factors on nitrate
5. This study highlights the involvement of the macroinvertebrate community in in-stream nitrate processing, and demonstrates the usefulness of applying a functional
approach to explain relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem function.|
|URI: ||Volume 62, Issue 5 Pages 821–965|
|Appears in Collections:||BIO - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.